손해배상
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
purport, purport, and.
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties, etc. 1) B was U.S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) and was changed to the current trade name on October 9, 2012 (hereinafter “B”).
2) The land adjoining to the instant case is the land adjacent to the 2,923m2,00 square meters in Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant adjacent land”).
(i)A facility for storing and treating hazardous substances, installed on the ground of the land adjacent to the instant building and its ground (total of 6 equipment, including gasoline underground storage tank 3, light oil storage tank 2, and one oil storage tank 1, which are specific facilities subject to the control of soil contamination) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant gas station”).
(2) Defendant C is the owner of the instant gas station from November 17, 2009 to June 2012, 2012. The trade name of the instant gas station from B is “IB”. A person who leased and operated the instant gas station, and Defendant D is a person who leased and operated the instant gas station from July 2012 to June 201.
3) Defendant E, F, and G were land located in five parcels, including 1,317.8 square meters in the Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, JJ 1,317.8 square meters, 5 square meters in V, 102 square meters in W, X large 103.6 square meters in X large 103.6 square meters in K large 94.1 square meters in size. On October 10, 2014, Defendant E, F, and G were combined into J large 1,826.3 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant land”).
(4) On July 23, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from Defendant E, F, and G on July 23, 2013, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff on August 21, 2013.
B. 1) Upon Defendant C’s request, the Korea Environment Institute of Science and Technology (hereinafter “Korea Environment Institute”) is a foundation.
From April 10, 2012 to April 13, 2012, the following samples are collected from four (T1, T2, P, and B) of the adjoining land of this case and the soil contamination level is subject to a regular inspection (hereinafter “the instant regular inspection”).
Around April 17, 2012, the instant regular inspection conducted a determination on the suitability of the adjoining land, and conducted a sample at a 1m level.