1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant A, B, E, F, and G’s appeal in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court that maintained by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted the said Defendants of all the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal principles on blanket crimes, and by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

2. According to the records on the grounds of Defendant H’s appeal, the above Defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and asserted only unfair sentencing on the grounds of appeal, and the lower court did not ex officio consider the matters alleged in the grounds of appeal as the subject of adjudication.

In such a case, the argument that the court below erred in violation of the rules of evidence is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.