However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 20, 2017, around 05:15, the Defendant forced indecent act: (a) was at the “C” restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) was seated after the victim D (at the age of 38) who was the customer; (c) was expected to have the head of the victim; and (d) was fright by the victim at the victim’s speech that “the victim would not speak,” and (d) her her her son’s her her son was forced to commit an indecent act by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to criminal investigations by assaulting the police officer, such as checking CCTV installed at the scene by the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Gangnam Police Station E box, who was called out after receiving D’s report at the same time and at a place as the preceding paragraph, driving the F’s head knife toward the face, booming the F’s head knife with his hand, and destroying the F’s head knife with his knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV case);

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Attend;

1. In full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, criminal record and risk of recidivism, profits and preventive effects expected due to the instant disclosure order and notification order, disadvantages and side effects, etc., there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information may not be disclosed or notified.

(C) The grounds for sentencing

(a) Category 1 Crimes (Interference with the performance of official duties);