Of the facts charged in the instant case, the lower court: (a) prepared false public documents concerning “the result of test and evaluation of the MM weapons systems for purchasing stocks” and “the result of test and evaluation (ROV, SS, IF, and Hms) of the MM weapons systems for purchasing stocks (Class 4); and (b) holding false public documents; and (c) holding false public documents; and (b) held by the Defendant Pc

M (M, hereinafter referred to as “N”)

2) The vessel height inquiry team of Q’s vessel, as proposed by the vessel height inquiry team of Q’s vessel (hereinafter “the vessel height inquiry team of this case”) is called the vessel height inquiry team of this case.

(2) In the process of the test and evaluation of the vessel of this case, it is difficult to believe that H’s investigative agency and the court below’s legal statement corresponding thereto are not sufficient to recognize it. However, H’s investigative agency and the court below’s legal statement should be deemed to have credibility, such as consistent with S, V, U’s investigative agency and the court below’s legal statement. (2) The court below determined that the vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s aircraft of H et al. (hereinafter “X”)’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s aircraft of h et al. (hereinafter “Y”)’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s vessel of this case’s Y and its subordinate practitioners of this case’s vessel of this case’s test and evaluation cannot be deemed to have any problem at the time of the test evaluation.