beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.07.20 2016고단1649

특수상해등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was at sight for the reason that the victim B was prevented from smoking tobacco in front of the 1st toilet of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, on the 22:00 on January 18, 2016, on the ground that the victim B was at the entrance of the toilet in front of the 1st toilet; (b) the victim B was at drinking six times at the face of the victim B; and (c) the victim was at the top of the 1st floor of the building of Ansan-si, Asan-si, the 1st floor of the F. of the 1st floor of the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the victim was at the time of raising the face of the Defendant, against the victim himself/herself, who was at the end of several times, and was at the end of the 1st toilet-si, a dangerous object that had been at the victim’s face, thereby resulting in the victim’s brain and the me at the bar.

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim’s face at the same time, time, and place as the above 1-A (A), and at the same time and place as the victim H used the victim’s face twice.

2. Defendant B, like the above-mentioned 1-A, was injured by the victim A at the top of the 1st floor of the building F of Ansan-si, the first floor of the building F of Ansan-si, and the first floor of the above 1-A, making it possible for the victim A several times, and the victim was suffering from injury, such as a 9th floor of the 2nd class, a 9th class of the left-hand body, a dyp, a dypump, and a dypumal salt.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant B and some of Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, B, and I;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against H and Defendant B;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the above defendant was merely engaged in b, H and horse fighting, and that he was engaged in b, or was engaged in b, or was engaged in b, or was engaged in flap or deb, in order to prevent the assault of B.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., the victim B, consistently from the investigative agency to this court, are taking his head and eating.