beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.05.02 2016고단348

폭행

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The facts charged in the instant case are as follows: (a) the Defendant was deprived of his/her employees at the place where he/she was engaged in golf practice in the instant practice on January 22, 2016 from the DG golf practice course expenses operated by the victim C (58 Do, South) in B around January 22, 2016.

I think that the rest of the victim was tightly tight, face and head when drinking.

This is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant on April 29, 2016, which was after the institution of the instant indictment, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.