국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From February 1, 2016 to March 1, 2016, the Defendant engaged in development activities by altering the form and quality of land, such as 22,923 square meters among 23,592 square meters in the Gyeong-gun, Cheongnam-gun, the Gyeongnam-gun, and 156 square meters among 810 square meters in the D previous 334 square meters, and 23,184 square meters in the aggregate of 24,736 square meters in the aggregate of 24,736 square meters in the value of 24,736 square meters in the value of 33,00 square meters in the value of 24,736 square meters in the value of 3,00 square meters in the value of 33,00 square meters in the value of 1,000
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of a photo of the site), and a criminal investigation report (Binding of data submitted by the office of the competent Si/Gun/Gu);
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs, aviation drawings, and forest geographic information;
1. Relevant Article 140 subparagraph 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the main sentence of Article 56 (1) 2 of the Act on the Planning and Utilization of Criminal Records, the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;
1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not include a large area of an unauthorized development activity, the punishment as ordered is to be determined by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and theories of the instant case, such as the fact that the Defendant reflects his/her criminal act, that the Defendant faithfully restores his/her original state, and that the Defendant does not have the same criminal history, and that there is no penalty history other than the fine.