However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 9, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim to pay the amount by adding up 10% profit to the actual cost after the completion of civil engineering works, and the actual cost was anticipated to be KRW 80 million to KRW 100,000 from KRW 80,000,00,000.

In concluding the contract as above, the Defendant knows that “I, within the territory of the Republic of Korea, knows a person who is prone to J, the land of the “I” movable property located at H in the Suwon-gu Busan, and is likely to have the removal of movable property as his/her father, and thus, the Defendant is likely to have a

In accordance with the removal works, the removal works will be renewed in KRW 80,000 per square day.

In addition, there may be a person who has within the scope of the removal of a club in the territory of the Suwon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, and may be accompanied by the contract.

It was said that expenses such as entertainment expenses need to be borne by 10 million won.

However, even if the defendant received expenses from the injured party, the defendant was only used as an existing debt repayment, etc., and did not have an intention or ability to accept the removal work for the victim, such as using it as entertainment expenses so that the removal work of the above play movable property or the removal of the age club can be ordered

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim as above, and acquired KRW 5 million from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant on August 9, 2013, around KRW 3 million on August 14, 2013, and KRW 2 million on August 16, 2013, and acquired KRW 10 million in total from the victim’s transfer.

around April 3, 2012, the Defendant supplied the victim N, “M coffee shop” located in the Busan East-gu L, Busan, with the amount equivalent to KRW 13 million to KRW 20 tons at the new loan site that he subcontracted to B. The Defendant supplied to B, the amount equivalent to KRW 13 million at the new loan site that he subcontracted.

First of all, 3.5 million won is paid in advance, and it is false to pay 3.5 million won in advance, which is the name of the supply price for steel in the place of damage.