beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.14 2014가합573770

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant E pays 85 million won to Plaintiff A, and 93 million won to Plaintiff B, respectively.

2. The plaintiffs defendant C, D, and .

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. F’s new construction and current status, etc. 1) Defendant E is a multi-household, a multi-household, in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G (hereinafter “F”).

24 households were newly built and managed while actually owning 24 households. As to the said 24 households, the registration of initial ownership was completed with the joint names (each of 1/2 shares) of Defendant E, h, or Defendant E and H (each of 1/2 shares). 2) The 1st floor of H’s name F 304 units (hereinafter “instant building”) was divided into 101 and 102 units on the building ledger and the copy of the register, but the actual use was divided into 101 units on the public record, 101, 102, 103 units, 102 units on the public record, and 102 units on the public record, and three independent households with labels 104, 105, 106 units on the public record.

B. Plaintiff A’s lease agreement 1) Plaintiff A’s brokerage of Defendant C, which operated the I Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office on March 5, 2012, with H, No. 101 (No. 102; hereinafter “instant housing first”) of the instant building between H and H.

(C) A lease agreement with respect to security deposit of KRW 85 million, term of lease from March 17, 2012 to March 17, 2014 (hereinafter “instant first lease agreement”).

A) At the time, Defendant E concluded a contract on behalf of the lessor H. (2) Of the confirmation and explanatory note [Ⅰ] (residential building)’s “verification and explanatory materials, etc.” attached to the instant lease contract, Defendant E included the “verification and explanatory materials, etc.” in the “verification and explanatory materials, etc.” in the “verification and explanatory materials, etc. of registration matters”, and “the indication of the object” was contained in the “violation” portion of the “violation of building register” and the “violation of violation” portion.

또한 ‘⑨ 실제권리관계 또는 공시되지 않은 물건의 권리사항’란에는 ‘선순위있음’이라고 기재되어 있다.

3. On March 20, 2012, Plaintiff A received the first house of this case, and obtained a fixed date in the first lease contract of this case, and on the same day.