However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 12, 2017, around 04:37, the Defendant filed a 112 report with the purport that “Around August 12, 2017, the Defendant intended to open a door to return home in the residence of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C 302, but did not open a door to the effect that “I would have caused drinking, and I would have about to go according to the drinking female (D).”

The police officer, who is the police officer belonging to the Gangnam Police Station E police box, in receipt of the report 112, called F, in around 04:42 on the same day, sent to the above place, called the Defendant's cell phone and called the Defendant's cell phone, and explained that he was called to the police officer in receipt of the report 112, and provided the Defendant with guidance so that he can do so out of the house.

The Defendant, upon hearing the explanation from F police officers and opening the entrance, sent out of the site to the scene, had the police officers attend the door, and expressed a large voice of “I am, Chewing, Chewing, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “I am bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.” The Defendant, on the ground that F police officers demand from F police officers to cause damages to other people, and that “I am bit bit bit bit bit bit,” on the ground that “I am bit bit bits bit bitch bit bitch bit

“The F police officer’s threshold was set at one time by sound and the Defendant’s hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of G and H

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case is not committed in accordance with the sentencing guidelines of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and the sentencing guidelines of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendation / [the scope of recommendation] that interferes with the performance of official duties, and the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the special sentencing person] of the crime of this case is not committed, and the crime of this case is not committed, and the punishment records of violence are not good and it reaches 22 times.