2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 14, 2019, the Plaintiff (1938 Life) was a person who received a fluoral nuclear removal of the U.S. load due to the escape certificate of a protruding signboard, and thereafter, the left heading horse that constitutes a permanent disorder was observed.

B. On September 2, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of disabled persons with the Defendant on his/her left side, and is classified into the class 5 of the calendar degree in the top section of the pipe and slot pipe, class 2 of the calendar class in the top section of the satisfaction pipe and the satisfaction pipe, into Noral (Class 5), God (Class 4), God (Class 3), Fair (Class 3), Poor (Class 2), Crace (Class 1), Zo (Class 0), and Zo (Class 2) [the criteria for determining the degree of disability].

1. D.

(3) See paragraph (3). The note mentioned above was submitted together.

On September 16, 2019, the Defendant requested the National Pension Service to conduct a precise examination of the Plaintiff’s degree of disability pursuant to Article 32(6) of the Welfare of Persons with Disabilities Act. On the following grounds, the National Pension Service determined the Plaintiff’s type of disability as “a failure to interfere with the physical disability” and “a person whose degree of disability is reduced by at least 75% in the length of a bridge between a serious disability and a serious disability”.

Accordingly, on October 25, 2019, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s level of disability (hereinafter “the first examination”). As a result of reviewing the diagnosis for the degree of disability and the data submitted, the Defendant stated the degree of disability in grades 2 to 5, and it is not recognized that there is a paralysis of less than class 3 on the whole of the left side bridge.

However, in light of the degree of damage to the upper pathy, the function of the upper pathy part of the left part which is confirmed on the additional data as a result of the examination, it is recognized that the function of the upper pathy part of the upper pathy part is reduced by at least 75%, and it is determined by applying mutatis mutandis the pathy part of one bridge.

Therefore, I make a decision on the left-hand disability, severe disability, etc.

(c)

After that, on December 6, 2019, the Plaintiff owned CUCR (TUSON) to the Defendant (which is a child with the Plaintiff’s residence).