If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On February 1, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court on February 1, 2008, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime in the same court on April 6, 2010, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime in the same court on November 14, 201.

On February 21, 2013, at around 01:10, the Defendant driven a BM520-car under the influence of alcohol level 0.078% from the five kilometers away from the two kinds of neons streets adjacent to the Seogu Seo-gu, Daegu, Seogu, to the front road of the Seogu, Seogu, Seogu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. inquiry report (A), investigation report (a copy of summary order) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order are not well-founded even when the defendant was sentenced several times to criminal punishment for drunk driving, and the criminal liability for the crime of this case is not less exceptionally applied to the crime of this case. On the other hand, the defendant has no same record as the suspended sentence, and is against the law, etc. shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances such as