All applications for compensation order shall be dismissed by applicants.

From December 2, 2009 to July 2017, the Defendant worked as a brokerage assistant of “G Authorized Brokerage Office” in the operation of F in Nam-gu, Busan.

피고인은 2014. 경 임대인 H, D로부터 부산 남구 I(17 세대 )에 대하여, 2011. 경 임대인 J으로부터, 2016. 6. 경 변경된 임대인 K로부터 같은 구 L( 일명 M, 15 세대 )에 대하여, 2014. 경 임대인 C로부터 같은 N(13 세대 )에 대하여, 2015. 2. 경 임대인 O, P로부터 같은 구 Q(28 세대 )에 대하여 각각 임대차 계약서 작성 등 건물 관리를 위임 받아 임대인들을 대신하여 임차인들과 임대 차계약을 체결하고 보증금과 월세를 받아 임대인들에게 전달하는 업무를 담당한 기회를 이용하여 보증금 및 월세를 가로챌 것을 마음먹었다.

1. On August 10, 2016, the fraud Defendant called “G Authorized Brokerage Office” to the victim K, the lessor of the said L, “The Plaintiff shall return KRW 30,000,000 of the deposit for the lease because the lease contract expires due to the termination of the lease contract,” and the new lessee under subparagraph 401 wishes to enter into a monthly lease contract, thereby receiving the guarantee and monthly payment of the lessee who returned the deposit for the lease on the deposit basis of the R and subsequently enters the new market.”

However, the Defendant intended to receive money from the victim in the name of the return of the deposit for the lease from the victim, even though it was not necessary for the lessor to return the deposit for the lease due to the expiration of the lease contract under 401.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 24,750,00 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of F; and (c) received from November 17, 2017, the Defendant, as stated in the attached Table I, deceiving the victims as stated in the attached Table I; and (d) received KRW 208,857,000 in total nine times from the victims.

2. On June 23, 2014, the Defendant is a lessor at the above “G Authorized Brokerage Office” as a lessor.