2. That the Defendant’s mistake is against his/her own fault

However, on the day of the instant case, it is deemed that there was a serious desire for the victim on the ground that he was her, and as a result, it seems that the victim was suffering from mental harm caused by the same travel product. Unlike the fact that there was no other circumstance to reduce the amount of punishment after the lower judgment, taking into account various conditions of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is deemed appropriate, and therefore, the above argument by the Defendant is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.