beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.07 2017나3814

공사대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 2016, when the Defendant prepared for the opening of the clothing store business of “C” (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”), the Defendant contacted the Plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) who run the business of installing LED signboard through the Internet search by the signboard company, and was introduced by the Plaintiff to the designated parties who run the interior company.

나. (1) 피고는 2016. 3. 29. 원고에게 카카오톡으로 “200만 원에 맞춰주어서 고마워요~^^”라는 메시지와 함께 이 사건 상가 외관을 촬영한 사진과 위 상가의 세부 주소를 전송하였다.

(2) From April 1, 2016, the Plaintiff consulted with the Defendant on the content and design of the instant commercial signboard, and transmitted the signboard fare list by promising to produce the signboard on the same day on April 6, 2016.

On April 18, 2016, the Plaintiff sent the message “C, AWW 2,390,000.” (3) On April 19, 2016, the Plaintiff produced the Defendant’s name to the instant commercial building at the Defendant’s request. (4) On September 6, 2016, the Plaintiff issued an electronic tax invoice of KRW 2,420,000, total of KRW 242,62,000, total of KRW 242,62,000, to the Defendant. (1) From April 11, 2016 to April 17, 2016, the Plaintiff continuously selected the Defendant’s digital tax invoice of the instant commercial building from around KRW 20,000 to KRW 2,62,00,00,000. (3) From around 200, the Plaintiff continued to pay the message of KRW 360,64,206,206.61.

Accordingly, the defendant continued to pay the due date and failed to comply with the promise, and transferred the amount of KRW 1,00,000 to the designated person on September 10, 2016.

The defendant around September 9, 2016, because the economic situation of the plaintiff is very difficult, the plaintiff is also 1 million won or 5 million won.