On February 18, 2012, at the community hall located in AsanD around 19:0, the Defendant: (a) called a meeting of the board of directors as the general duties of “E farming corporations” and called the meeting on the day of the meeting without giving prior notice of convening the meeting; (b) carried the victim, and (c) caused the victim’s hair to the victim’s hair by fasting the victim’s chest with the victim’s hair, and caused the victim’s hair to face with the victim’s hair, thereby causing about 8 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each part of the statements by the witness C, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. The defendant asserts that there is no fact that the judgment of the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim, as to the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment.

According to the above evidence, the following circumstances can be acknowledged.

In other words, when the police first went to the community center, the defendant saw the farming machinery when he was in the second place, and entered the community center without any fact, entered the center again after he went to the center, and he took a bath to I et al., and stated to the effect that he was in the center by leaving the center, and there was no physical contact with the victim. The prosecutor stated that the prosecutor carried the farming machinery to the community center with the farming machinery, deducted the G et al., and went to the center, and put the room into the center.

It was stated that there was no violence on the part of the victim, and that there was no violence on the part of the victim.

On the other hand, the witnesses are somewhat different in their detailed location or process in investigative agencies and this court. However, all consistently, the defendants stated the fact that they fightings by putting the victim's body in the village hall and the victim's breath.