According to the records, the first instance court maintained by the court below's reasoning that it did not agree to the defendant's admissibility of evidence, and therefore, it was erroneous for the court below to state the "report on the Control of Customs Business Offices" not adopted as evidence as a summary

However, the remaining evidence duly adopted by the lower court and the first instance court is sufficient to determine the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged. Thus, the lower court’s above error affected the conclusion of the judgment.

In addition, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine without exhausting all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.