유류분 청구권
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is that "2013." No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance "2013." (1) The part concerning the defense of the extinctive prescription of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows 2. and the defendant added new judgment as to the claim at the court of first instance 3. It is identical with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the defendant's assertion of the extinctive prescription of this case was accepted pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. On December 13, 2012, 200, the plaintiff B and the new bank of the deceased, "2013." (hereinafter "2013.) was removed from the court of first instance, under the circumstances where all co-inheritors, including the plaintiffs, and the plaintiff's right to claim the return of the legacy of this case was known at the time of the commencement of the inheritance of the deceased or the deceased's heir of this case.