성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (two months of imprisonment and additional collection) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.
2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a healthy sexual culture; the crime of this case is committed during the repeated period; there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant's age and happiness environment and circumstances before and after the crime, are considered as being too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.