Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The fact that on March 29, 2012, the plaintiff was found to have been charged with violating the duty to faithfully maintain the above apartment's right on behalf of D with the right of retention of KRW 100,000,000 as the claim for construction cost regarding the Seodaemun-gu Seoul apartment on behalf of the above apartment, while exercising the right of retention on behalf of D, and thus, he waived the right of retention on July 25, 2007 and completed the above apartment on May 152, 200, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership with the bid price of KRW 10,00,000 on behalf of the above plaintiff 2. The defendant did not know that the above apartment's first instance court (Seoul Western District Court Decision 200,000,000,000) was not found to have been found to have been acquitted by the defendant on account of the lack of evidence to acknowledge that the defendant was not guilty on behalf of the above plaintiff 1, 2012.