손해배상(의)
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiffs' claims expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.
The defendant.
Basic Facts
Plaintiff A’s status as the parties is a person who was subject to vertebathic, etc. at the Mangsan-si Ulsan-si U.S. Institute (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); Plaintiff B’s husband, Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A and B.
Plaintiff
On March 8, 2004, the plaintiff A sent to E member (hereinafter referred to as "foreign member") above the left-hand sense of her past history and the defendant hospital's internal source to the E member (hereinafter referred to as "the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the E member of the Eththyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyys
After all, the medical personnel of the non-party member filed a new appeal to the plaintiff A on May 10, 2004, and on July 12, 2004, respectively, on August 4, 2004, the non-party member filed a second appeal to the plaintiff, and the medical personnel continued to perform the treatment accordingly.
Plaintiff
A, on February 20, 2006, on September 7, 2007, filed an appeal to Nonparty Council member, and on October 30, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an appeal to Nonparty Council member, stating that “The X-ray test conducted by Nonparty Council member, which was diagnosed as a protruding escape certificate, was being diagnosed as a protruding escape certificate and received physical treatment.”
Accordingly, on November 1, 2007, the medical personnel of the non-party council regarded the cirrosis and other conical signboards impairment accompanied by the neutism as the main disease, and continued to provide the above treatment until December 24, 2007.
On the other hand, in order to identify whether it is possible to conduct an additional evaluation and surgery of the plaintiff's symptoms, the medical professionals of the non-party member requested the plaintiff's medical care to a higher hospital, and on March 25, 2004, the plaintiff A was provided seven times prior to May 12, 2005, who was transferred to the defendant hospital's surgery.
The execution of the first operation of this case and the plaintiff A who passed this process.