However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 10, 2017, at around 16:10 on May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) informed the Defendant’s wife of the fact that the Defendant wraped with another person on the part of the Defendant; (b) released the victim’s parts, etc. on one occasion due to the boomed breabbbbb, which is a dangerous object prepared in advance; and (c) put the victim’s left parts and blue blus, which is a dangerous object from the blusb, of the victim’s blusction; and (d) put the victim into a blusction of the victim’s blusction and bluscties on one occasion, taking the victim’s left parts and bluscties in need of approximately two weeks’ treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged property: (a) the date and time set forth in the above paragraph (1) above; (b) the victim was assaulted by the Defendant and reported to 112 to the victim’s mobile phone; and (c) the victim took away his/her cell phone from his/her possession in order to prevent the victim from reporting, thereby damaging his/her market price as he/she was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Sponsor photographs of the upper part of the cell phone and the cell phone pictures damaged;

1. A seizure list;

1. At the site of confiscated grain, brue and large loss;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury), and 366 (a point of damage to property and choice of imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Each of the crimes of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, where the defendant carried with himself a dangerous article under the influence of alcohol and thereby inflicts an injury on the victim, the damage of the victim’s property and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the circumstance and method, etc., and the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime.