All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In particular, on April 17, 2013, the judgment of the court of Gwangju District Court sentenced 2 years of suspended sentence to 6 months of imprisonment with labor for interference with business, etc., 2 years of probation, probation, community service order 120 hours, alcohol treatment lectures, 40 hours of imprisonment with labor for 6 months in Gwangju District Court's order for interference with business, etc. The above judgment committed the crime of this case without any knowledge even though it was confirmed on April 25, 2013 and was still under suspended sentence period, and the defendant's frequent act of disturbance of drinking gases seems to have suffered from big pain, and it appears that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant appeared to have been suffering from extreme pain, and that the family of the defendant made efforts to prevent the defendant from repeating again through active cooperation with the victim's alcohol addiction treatment, and the defendant's favorable circumstances, age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances of the crime of this case, and the result after the crime of this case are unreasonable or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 346(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.