도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 8, 2003, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license) at the Busan District Court, at the Busan District Court on November 6, 2006, as a fine of KRW 1.5 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (free license) at the Busan District Court on December 15, 2008, as a fine of KRW 500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (on December 15, 2008, from the Busan District Court’s branch branch branch, at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Dong Branch, and on May 10, 2016, the summary order of KRW 5 million was issued.
1. Despite the fact that the Defendant had driven a vehicle twice or more, on September 13, 2018, at around 08:12, the Defendant driven a f knife vehicle without a vehicle driver’s license from the roads adjacent to C in Busan B, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.131% of alcohol level, from September 13, 2018 to E in Suwon-gu D, and without a vehicle driver’s license.
2. The Defendant, at the same date and time as Paragraph 1, and at the same place as that of Paragraph 1, controlled a drunk driving, used the Defendant’s prior recording of a mobile device (PDA) to enter the Defendant’s private village Hah’s name and resident registration number, and to enter the said G’s personal information and control details, etc., by accessing the Defendant’s private village Hah’s private village Hah’s transport information network (PDA), and to enter the said G’s personal information and control details, etc. into the Hah’s personal information, etc., after signing the electronic document on the PDA’s portable device screen from the Defendant, and forged the H’s electronic records on the certification of facts, and by sending the portable device to the said G, as seen above, transmitted the results of the blood driving control, which is a written prior recording, to the traffic police network.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged the special media records, such as H’s electronic records on a certificate of fact, with a view to making business process smooth, and exercised them.
3. Paragraph (1) shall apply to the defendant who forges private documents and uttering private documents.