At around 12:30 on April 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “D” cosmetics shop operated by the Victim C in Masung City B; (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant: (c) destroyed the gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; (d) on the part of the victim’s market value, at the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 37,000 (37,000) and (e) destroyed the victim’s ownership by means of inserting one am and one ambe in the am and clothes retail, equivalent to KRW 34,00,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Notification to a department related to 112 Incident Report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act of the choice of criminal punishment, the injury of reasons for sentencing of imprisonment is not recovered, and considering