The lower court convicted the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the constituent elements and expectation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act.

In this case where a sentence of imprisonment with labor for less than 10 years is pronounced against the defendant, the argument of sentencing is not a legitimate ground of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.