beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.03.20 2018구단7901

주거이전비 청구의 소

Text

1. The Defendant’s 17,283,956 won and 4,403,273 won from July 20, 2018 to the Plaintiff, and the remainder of 12,880,683 won.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 24, 2008, the Suwon City announced a public announcement of the designation of the rearrangement zone and the improvement plan for the public inspection of residents (hereinafter “instant public announcement”) with respect to the B Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement Project”).

B. On December 11, 2015, the Suwon City announced the project implementation authorization as follows with respect to the instant rearrangement project.

The location and area of a rearrangement zone: A project operator who is a project operator of 171,652m2 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si: the defendant

C. On October 25, 200, the Defendant was a cooperative established to promote the instant improvement project, and D and E, the Plaintiff and their children, made a move-in report to the Suwon-si F (Road Name G: Suwon-si, Suwon-si), located within the instant improvement project zone, and leased part of the lease to a reinforced concrete building, slabbro 3 floors, neighborhood living facilities, and retail stores with 102.18 square meters of the first floor among the housing owned by H on the ground at the above address (hereinafter “instant store”), and continuously used and continuously resided for residential purposes.

The plaintiff's spouse I made a move-in report to the store of this case on October 25, 200 and continued to reside with the plaintiff from the time of that move-in report. From December 24, 2003 to October 18, 2004 during that period, I made a move-in report to the J of Y during the period, and from December 7, 2001, E in the plaintiff was born on December 7, 2001 and continued to reside with the plaintiff.

E. The use of the instant store is registered as “retail store” in the collective building ledger and register. The instant store is divided into two parts with walls, and the remaining part is used as “K”’s trade name, but the Northwest part is used as “K” but the Plaintiff’s family uses it as a residential space.

F. Meanwhile, L was engaged in restaurant business by leasing the remaining part of the instant store from the owner M of the instant store, and M around January 1996.