beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.09.07 2016고단6114

사기

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the representative of social welfare foundation C in Daegu Dong-gu, who operates the long-term “D” and “E” as its affiliated facilities.

Where a person operating a long-term medical care institution provides long-term medical care benefits to beneficiaries and claims long-term medical care benefits to the National Health Insurance Corporation, in violation of the standards for placement of human resources under relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, where a sanatorium for older persons is operated as a sanatorium for older persons with insufficient medical care care staff members, he/she may claim long-term care benefits benefits by reducing the relevant monthly care benefits rate according to the vacancy rate, and where employees are additionally placed and operated during the relevant violation period, he/she may receive additional care benefits by up to 10%; however, where the amount of long-term care insurance for older persons has not been additionally placed or is reduced due to other reasons, he/she shall not claim long-term care benefits in addition to the amount of long-term care benefits; however, where the rating of long-term care insurance for older persons is improved, he/she may receive 50,000 won at one time as the incentive for the improvement of rating, but shall not claim the incentive for improvement of rating if the amount of long-term care benefits has

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by accessing the Internet homepage of the National Health Insurance Corporation on November 4, 2009 at the above D office, claimed KRW 77,381,730 for long-term care benefit costs as if the victimized person was in charge of normal care care care care care care care care care benefits.

However, the F, G, H, and I did not take charge of the normal duties of care protection, and thus claimed long-term care benefit costs by considering the ratio of vacancy to the care protection in claiming long-term care benefit costs.

the United States.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.