beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2017.02.01 2016고정84

자동차손해배상보장법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall operate a vehicle that has not been covered by mandatory insurance, but the accused shall do so.

1. Running a BRano vehicle in one’s name, which is not covered by mandatory insurance on the front of a rural village in front of the fire-fighting village in the area other than the mountain of the Si of Jung-Eup on July 11, 2013;

2. On February 24, 2016, at the time of transfer to the Ham Chang-gun, a D E-II vehicle in the name of ASEAN, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, is operated in the order of the net hold at the top and front of the road;

3. On January 25, 2014, at the time of the transfer of the Ham Chang-gun, operates the e-Lebbb nife at the front of the village of the same village under his name, which was not covered by mandatory insurance;

4. On June 15, 2016, on the roads front of the monthly head office distance in the Seoyang-gun, Daejeon-gun, the company operated the e-Libbro feb feb feb feb feb feb feb.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into respective non-insurance operation vehicles, inquiry into each mandatory insurance contract, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inspection of each ledger of motor vehicle registration;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles which are selected, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fines specified in the summary order shall be imposed in light of the grounds for and frequency of the crime committed in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the criminal records of the defendant, etc.

It does not seem that it does not appear.