However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, “2014 Highest 1586” from July 2007 to July 2013, 2013, was a person who operated D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) in the name of “D Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter “D”) under the 704 of Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C Building 704.

On June 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “F” conference room located in Mineyang-si, Jeonyang-si, the Defendant would recruit 30 students, including elementary school students, middle school students, etc., from July 2013 to August 2013, the Defendant would give a total of 1.5 million won for each university student, and that “The Defendant would allow the said elementary school students and middle school students to send 1.5 million won to the Philippines and receive the education training.”

However, fact that the defendant operated ① D(State) in 2013

1. Above

6. The tax base of the ordinary half-term sales (income amount) was in a situation in which no particular profits accrue at KRW 1,684,00, and ② the salary for the employees of the above company was not paid at once. ③ The individual debt amount did not reach KRW 1 billion, ③ the personal debt amount was registered as a bad credit holder because it was impossible to repay the second financial right obligations, ④ the victims were paid the amount paid under the pretext of sending the second educational right training from July 2013 to February 2013. The victims were actually operating the above fish-term training center with the so-called “defluencing type,” such as appropriation for the language training campaign expenses progress from around December 2, 2012 to February 2013. If it was impossible to continuously apply for the language training in the future, it was impossible for the victims to operate the fish-based training center under the rescue structure due to the lack of expenses, ⑤ even if the above building was leased, there was no intention or ability to reduce the overdue training from the victims.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victims, and is under the pretext of the expenses for language training from the victim G and the victim H.