If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

On November 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for interference with business at the Busan District Court on November 17, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 17, 2017.

around 13:30 on August 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the Defendant’s desire to “Dju” operated by the Victim C (Y, L, 47 years of age) located in Busan Youngdo-gu B; (b) expressed the Defendant’s desire not to enter his own horse; and (c) avoided the Defendant’s drinking by force on two occasions, such as: (a) 16:40 on the same day, on the grounds that the victimized person reported the instant case to the police, and (b) 16:40 on the same day, the Defendant re-exploited and re-exprised the Defendant’s drinking business by force on two occasions, including: (b) 10 minutes of the instant case to prevent other customers from entering the drinking house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police for C and E;

1. Each letter (22 pages of investigation records);

1. Previous convictions: Results of case search, application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (Selection of a punishment penalty);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;