beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.20 2016가단5085930

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Grounds for recognition;

A. On September 30, 1995, the Plaintiff purchased from K the instant site ‘the time when the site is referred only to the building site’ (the instant site is referred to as “the time when the site is referred to as the building)’ (the remaining payment date and the real estate name date as of October 31, 1995), and registered the ownership transfer under the Plaintiff’s name on December 1, 1995.

B. The real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “land in dispute”) is registered as the ownership of the network L (hereinafter “the network”), and the deceased died on April 8, 1996, and the deceased died on August 24, 1990, and the wife M, M, and the network N (the front line of the network was deceased on August 24, 1990, and the heir succeeded to the property by Defendant F, Defendant H, G, and I, the heir of the property, and thereafter, the heir succeeded to the property by inheritance of the above children. The M died on November 7, 2001.

(The final inheritance share shall be as shown in the attached Form).

Land in dispute is adjacent to “O road” as it is, and is located between “P” and “ Q”, and is in the shape of “R,S,” “T” and “A” connected to the instant site. Except for the part adjacent to the instant site, the shape of a narrow channel is surrounded by each ground building of “R” between the neighboring site and the instant site.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap's 1, 2, 3 (including paper numbers), Eul's 2, and 3, the whole purport of the pleading.

2. The Plaintiff purchased the instant real estate and transferred it on October 31, 1995, and occupied and used it from around that time. The disputing land also has been occupied and used together with the intent of possession, knowing that it was part of the instant real estate (such as access roads, front and rear, multi-use rooms, and toilet sites). The Defendants, the deceased’s heir, were the Plaintiff’s heir, on October 31, 2015.