When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the first floor of the Cju-si located in Speaker C on October 27, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s property damage by cutting off the word “C” on his hand from the signboard installed on the main outer wall of the Cju-si, without any reason, without the influence of alcohol, so that approximately KRW 200,000 of the repair cost may be damaged.

2. The Defendant’s interference with the performance of official duties was found to have caused the destruction of signboards at the above time and place, and assaulted D, the main employee of the police station of the Jung-gu government Police Station, in order for F, who was arrested as a current offender, to proceed to the police station with the Defendant who was arrested as a current offender, and the F, f, was charged with the f, f, f, and f, f, f, f, f, f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate arrest of flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant was in a mental and physical state due to the breath of alcohol at the time of the instant crime.

According to the records, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the content of the crime of this case, the attitude of the defendant, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., it is not recognized that the defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing property damage) and the selection of each fine concerning the facts of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment is to damage another person’s property without any particular reason under the influence of alcohol, and to assault a police officer dispatched after receiving a report of 112 by the child.