Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

1. Around 00:10 on December 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) placed a convenience store located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the street; (b) placed the victim D (the victim D (the victim south, 57 years old); and (c) placed the rocketing cab at the above place; and (d) paid the victim a taxi fee upon arrival at the above place; and (c) confirmed the fact of the Gu soil, the victim provided a 10-minute bath for the victim; and (d) laid the window of the victim’s cab in hand, took the victim’s knife and knife the knife and caused the victim to be unable to drive the cab.

The Defendant interfered with the victim’s taxi business by force.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 12. 27. 00:20 경 서울 영등포구 B에 있는 C 편의점 앞 노상에서, 제 1 항과 같이 D에게 행패를 부려 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 영등포 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경찰관 G, H이 D의 진술을 청취하고 D으로 하여금 현장을 떠나게 하자, 경찰관들에게 욕설을 하면서 손으로 G의 왼뺨을 3회 때리고 G의 엄지손가락을 할퀴고 H이 입고 있던 경찰 조끼를 손으로 세게 잡아 당겼다.

As such, the Defendant assaulted police officers G and H, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties on the prevention of crimes and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the contents and progress of each crime on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the degree of damage inflicted on duties and official duties, the criminal liability is irrelevant.