On November 25, 2016, the Defendant is driving the above vehicle on the front side of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Mapo-gu) around 05:08, while driving the vehicle on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle. In such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving, has a duty of care to show the front side and properly manipulate the steering and steering devices, thereby preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and driven a vehicle in the state of drinking and started the vehicle as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driver, caused the victim’s left-hand knee knee knee knee kne, resulting in the victim’s left-hand sle knes and kne in need of treatment for about two weeks, and rejected the police officer’s

2. As evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, the victim’s investigative agency, legal statement, and written diagnosis of injury are included.

However, in light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, i.e., CCTV videos secured through a nearby shop at the time, the Defendant’s repeated operation of the said car at the time does not appear to have a face to the extent of causing the injury to the victim, and the victim does not play or appeal for the pain with the said car. Nor is the victim’s constant contact with the said car, or the victim is continuously going or walked, and the victim’s constant appearance is taken; ② The victim suffers from the injury to the bones at the time, or the victim’s physical appearance, not from the injury to the bones at the time, and from the fact-finding with the F-type department G, the test was observed at the early wave test.

One of them is not only the evidence of the defendant, but also the accident of this case.