난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On January 7, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on January 17, 2014, prior to the expiration of the period of stay ( February 6, 2014), when entering the Republic of Pakistan for a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn on a short-term basis (C-3), and staying therein.
B. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer persecution” as a refugee requirement under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion MM is a political party that does not recognize the government of Pakistan and does violence demonstration, terrorism, etc.
From March 201, when the Plaintiff started its business, there was a letter of intimidation from the members of the QM political party, which would put 5,000 p.m. 5,00 p.m. until October 2013, 201.
On October 10, 2013, the members of the QM political party found the plaintiff's shop and made a threat to prepare 200,000 prus directly to the plaintiff.
Since 5 days after the plaintiff was unable to prepare only 50,000 am, the above party members cited the plaintiff's ambling in the plaintiff's shop again, and took money as well as threatening the plaintiff to kill by making ambry, assault, and assault.
On the other hand, Skman Com mite is an organization under the People's Party of Pakistan (PP), which is the camping party of Pakistan.
On October 2013, the plaintiff was threatened by the threat of 50 US dollars from the persons who had been armed at the end of the end of 2013, and was bound to receive their demands twice in the threat of the persons who had been armed at the end.
The plaintiff could not be able to bear much burden on the threat of QM, and thus, the plaintiff requested to help QM.