However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) thought that the victim D, an agent of B apartment C, was driving the vehicle of the Defendant’s wife at a dangerous level; (b) caused the victim to get off the vehicle in front of the B apartment Cdong; (c) obstructed the victim’s face by drinking the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front; and (d) obstructed the victim’s face by drinking the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the victim in front of the vehicle in front

2. On March 23, 2019, around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) committed violence in a way that francs his bomb by hand, when a slope F, a police officer belonging to the Sinung Police Station E-district, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1), prevented the Defendant from assaulting the victim; and (b) assaulted F’s b

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that a police officer dispatched by a defendant has a record of punishment for a crime of violence, the degree of violence is not minor, and disadvantageous circumstances

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;