If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Around 10:00 on July 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) interviewed with F in the office room of the third floor of the office room of the (3rd floor) of the (44 years of age), the workplace of the victim D (the husband and D), E, the workplace of the victim D, which is the workplace of the victim C, and confirmed that the Defendant had a relation with F, known that D and D had the same husband in the vehicle, and reported to the police, was without witness. The Defendant had no witness. The Defendant had received two letters and had telephone conversations from time to time; (b) thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out a fact about the relationship between the victim and G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone communications with the husband of a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.