beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2020.05.12 2019고단3179

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

[2019 Highest 3179]

1. On November 2, 2019, from around 18:10 to 19:00 of the same day, the Defendant rejected the Defendant’s demand from the “Emart” operated by the victim D (the 60-year-old) in the Sungnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B apartment shopping mall C, that the victim would drink on credit, and thus, the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s demand from the “Emart”, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and there is money, so how much, I am in this building.” The Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire at the large interest of “I am, I am, I am, and I am in this building.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's marina business by force.

2. The Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as breathing the victim’s breath, breathing the victim’s breath, 3 breathing the victim’s breath, cutting the victim’s breath, breathing the victim’s body on the part of the victim, and taking the victim’s body by breathing the victim’s hand

[2020고단440] 피고인은 2020. 2. 2. 18:56경 성남시 수정구 F, 1층 주점에서 술에 취하여 소리를 지르는 등 소란을 피우다가 112 신고를 받고 출동한 성남수정경찰서 G파출소 소속 경장 H, 순경 I으로부터 귀가를 권유받자 “이 새끼들 웃기네, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐. 차버린다 새끼야, 까불어 이 자식아, 내가 니들 끌고 갈께”라고 소리를 지르면서 I의 멱살을 2회 잡아 흔들고 오른손을 들어 때릴 듯이 위협하는 등 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the dispatch and handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 Highest 3179]

1. On the spot of the police statement of the defendant concerning D's legal statement, his/her photograph (13 pages of investigation records), a photograph to capture CCTV images (41 pages of investigation records) (41 pages of investigation records)

1. The written statement of the police statement of the defendant concerning I in the court statement of the defendant concerning the defendant I, the closure photographs of the video (32 pages of the investigation records) and the CCTV image image image-finding records.