특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On April 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business from the Busan District Court’s Vice Branch on April 13, 2017 and completed the execution of the sentence on August 10, 2017.
[2019Gohap28] On February 15, 2019, at around 03:30 on February 15, 2019, the Defendant threatened the victim, who prevented the victim from paying trial expenses to other customers from the main point of the trade name “D” operated by the victim C (W, who is 49 years of age) in Kimpo-si, by gathering an empty beer, which is a dangerous object on the table, and by holding the victim’s blap, with a hand, flap with the victim’s blap, flaping the blap, and flaping the blap, which is a dangerous object on the table.
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.
[2019Gohap60]
1. On May 11, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim G (52 years of age) who passed a path in front of the F Kap in the E-distance at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, without any reason, while under the influence of alcohol, by pushing the victim G (52 years of age) in his/her hands.
2. Interference with business;
A. At around 01:30 on December 18, 2018, the Defendant ordered the victim’s alcohol at the D main points operated by the victim C in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, but was refused due to the absence of credit rating, and thus, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s main points by force for two hours, by putting the disturbance on the part of other customers located in the main points and passing the victim’s heavy noise.
B. On December 30, 2018, the Defendant, at around 00:0, performed alcohol at D main points operated by the victim C in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, without any justifiable reason, obstructed the victim’s main points operation by force for about 1:20 minutes and 20 minutes, and interfere with the victim’s main points operation by putting the disturbance, such as d main points operated by the victim C, and harming the customer’s operation of the victim’s main points by force.
[2019 Gohap65] Defendant