A. As to the crime No. 1-C of the 2017 High Order No. 1883 of the judgment below, the Defendant is not a joint operator who has invested eight million won business funds in the E business establishment.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (one year of imprisonment and a fine of 15 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, including the Defendant’s statement in the court of the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant was recognized as a co-operator of the “E” on the first floor of the Seoul Yangcheon-gu Seoul F building from February 5, 2017 to February 14, 2017. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. In full view of the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, the Defendant continued to arrange sexual traffic in various ways despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, as it is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.