However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from March 19, 2016, was a person working at C Z in B from May 5, 2016, who was absent from work without permission from around May 5, 2016, and the head of the said ZED (the age of 24) was thought to ignore himself, and had a good appraisal about the said D.

On June 1, 2016, at around 17:20, the Defendant: (a) heard from the employee F (son, 23 years of age) of the above C’s son (“F”) who received the foregoing D’s instructions from the Defendant’s residence; (b) called “I will die. I will do so. I now move to the front and rear of the H located in G, with a gun (the length of 26cc, 12cc) and a knife (the knife length of 21cc, 10cc, knife length of knife) holding the knife (the length of 21cc, 10.5cc) and the knife’s knife (the knife length of knife).

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects that could be commonly used in violent crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of police seizure records and photographs statutes;

1. Article 7 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after the commission of crime, shall be determined by taking into account the following facts: (a) there is no record of criminal punishment for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act; and