beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.04.17 2014고단165

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was working as a contract-based consulting employee who received benefits according to the number of loans occurred without fixed pay in a company fresh 702-19, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the purpose of which is to provide entrusted loan recruitment services, etc. on 8th, Gangnam-gu.

[209, the Defendant, from around 2009, received annual salary of KRW 6,00 to KRW 90,000,00 from the SC Bank in the manner of receiving loans from the above bank in the name of the above customer by borrowing the above customer’s existing debt from the above company’s lending to the customer who could not receive a loan from the bank due to a low credit rating due to the existing debt. However, since around 2012, the regulation on the new loan review was strengthened in the SC Bank, the Defendant borrowed the previous loan to the previous customer with the knowledge that the principal and interest on its own loan was not repaid in a normal manner, and was not repaid to the said customer. However, in order to continue to borrow money from the previous customer with the knowledge of the fact that it was not able to receive a loan from the above company’s lending from the above company’s lending.

On May 13, 2013, the Defendant sent an attitude to pay principal and interest by lending money to the victim G, who is an employee of the company at the above office by the above method, to the victim G, who is an employee of the company, by means of the above method, and fraudulently read as “It is necessary to carry out the documents in advance, 74 million won.”

However, in fact, from January 2013, the Defendant had been in a situation where the principal and interest burden of the borrowed loan was accumulated in the amount of KRW 3 to 400 million to raise the loan performance by the above method, and there was no property to repay the above debt, and its own benefit alone could not be in charge of the above debt.