2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Defendant, while serving as the Plaintiff from December 5, 2005 to May 30, 2015, was in charge of electrical safety control at the head of a branch office in the inner, high level, and Yangyang area.

B. At the time of the Defendant’s employment, the Defendant prepared each of the following descriptions (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”).

1. The agreement on January 1, 2014

3. The defendant does not divulge information, such as the trade name and address of the acceptance price under a contract with the company, and the amount of agency fees, without permission of the plaintiff.

4. When the defendant retires from office, he shall not be employed by an enterprise of the same kind of business within three years from the date of retirement or operate the same kind of business within the business territory of the plaintiff.

(A) Upon termination of a contract for acceptance under the name of the plaintiff, the defendant's employment or the company established by the defendant shall not act as an agent for electrical safety management or discharge, with the trade name of the company or the company established by the defendant). If the prohibition of competitive operations is violated, the amount of KRW 50 million shall be paid

2. The agreement dated November 23, 2010

1. The defendant shall not divulge or divulge the trade name, address, capacity of the inmate under contract with the plaintiff to the outside.

2. He shall not arbitrarily transfer or acquire by transfer his goods to another person;

3. The defendant shall not act as an agent for electrical safety management or as an agent for electrical safety management in the name of the principal or in the name of the company where the principal is employed, in case where the principal retires with the information of the recipient acquired while working for the plaintiff, within two years from the date of retirement.

C. On May 30, 2015, the Defendant submitted to and withdrawn from the Plaintiff, and entered the same company’s electric safety management.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 10, 12, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 as to the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Defendant violated the prohibition agreement on competition or withdrawal under the agreement on January 1, 2014, and thus, the acceptance violated the prohibition agreement on prior dismissal. Thus, the Defendant is liable for penalty 5.