The punishment against A shall be 6 months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant B shall be 4 months, respectively.

except that this judgment.

1. Defendant A’s special assault, around November 3, 2017, brought about delivery food on the fourth floor of Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu Seoul, and B(34) around November 3, 2017.

In other words, B expressed “kick, Chewing,” and the chemical B expressed “hicker,” regardless of the desire to do so, she saw it as “hicker, throwed on the floor, broken it on the floor, shooted on B’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s f’s b’s b’s b’s b’s b’s

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, committed assault by Defendant B by setting up a battop, setting up against the Defendant’s bat, and setting up a battop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of Defendant A and Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Investigation reports and investigation reports (the relative investigation of police officers in mobilization related to the suspect B);

1. Photographs taken of a uniform at the time of the investigation into B of the victim;

1. The content of the 112 Report (the defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that although the defendant A was on the floor with beer's disease and was on the wall of the victim B with beer's bat, the victim B had been on the wall with beer's escape, the plaintiff A and his defense counsel did not have been on the back of the victim B's water.

However, the victim B has consistently and specifically stated the background leading up to the occurrence of the fire with the defendant A in this law and investigative agency, the contents of the conversation between the defendant A and him, the contents of the conversation between the defendant A and the defendant, and the process of assaulting the defendant A by throwing beer disease on the floor of the beer disease, bombing him, etc., and collecting the fire, fire extinguishing, etc.

Unlike the victim’s statement B, it does not appear that there are any other circumstances to open false statements, and the credibility of the statement is recognized in light of the attitude of the victim’s statement in this court.

Other documents submitted, such as photographs, etc. taken by the victim B's head and the mother and child at the time of the case.