However, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment four times including suspended execution due to the same crime, and some of the crimes of this case were committed in the course of investigation by an investigative agency or after being referred to a trial. The crime of fraud of this case is unfair because the court below's punishment (one year of imprisonment) is too unfavorable for the defendant, taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant's ordinary circumstances are unfavorable to the defendant, including the fact that there is no agreement with the victims, and the victims are punished against the defendant, by taking into account the following circumstances, such as the defendant's character, conduct, motive, family relation, etc., by deceiving him/her that he/she would repeatedly pay the proceeds of use, evading the payment of the proceeds of use, or deceiving him/her as if he/she had sold the goods to an unspecified number of unspecified persons in a planned manner by using the Internet anonymousness, inducing the payment of the proceeds of use, or by deceiving the proceeds of such fraud

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.