The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The argument in the grounds of appeal is that the plaintiff and the defendant did not have a partnership relationship for the period from December 15, 2009 to November 4, 2010, and the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on joint business on July 27, 2010 between the plaintiff and the defendant was prepared formally. The defendant used the money that the defendant withdrawn from the F account as the expenses of the welfare center of this case, including oil prices, and even though the defendant paid the plaintiff's health insurance fees on behalf of the plaintiff, the judgment of the court below was erroneous for fact-finding in violation of the rules of evidence, and thus, the judgment of the court below is unlawful. However, this is merely a matter of the selection of evidence and fact-finding, which are all the matters of the court below'

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.