If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On August 17, 2012, the Defendant and B, around 17:40, committed fraud, based on the fact that the Defendant and B had been operated by Gwangju Dong-gu C Victim D, were aware that they would have paid food value from the beginning even though they did not have any intent or ability to pay food value, they did not pay the price even if they had been provided with food equivalent to KRW 26.00 per cent of 2 disease per week 26.00.

2. At the same time and time as set forth in Paragraph 1, the Defendant and B interfered with the business, and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by leaving a large amount of interest, such as: (a) the Defendant scaming the scams on the floor and scaming the scams on the scams that were placed on the scams, and leaving the scams on the scams; and (b) preventing customers who intend to enter the scams by avoiding disturbance from entering the scams.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and B;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of a receipt, and statutes governing field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;