A. Among the area of 109 square meters in Busan-gun, each point of the attached Form 11, 12, 13, 14, 11 is indicated in the attached Form.

A. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as a result of an appraisal commission to the Korea Land Information Corporation of this Court, the following facts may be acknowledged in each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2:

(1) On August 9, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the Plaintiff’s name on August 9, 2012 with respect to the land of 109 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”). As to D major 242 square meters and a single-story house of 59.49 square meters and its ground, the registration of ownership transfer under the Defendant’s name was completed on October 24, 2017 with respect to the storage of the block structure slive roof and the 3.24 square meters of affiliated building (hereinafter “Defendant’s building”).

r. However, among the defendant's buildings, the attached expert opinions are linked in order to each point of 11, 12, 13, 14, and 11.

In order to connect each point of 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 20, and 19 square meters of a part toilet and the same drawing indication, it shall be referred to a ship which connects each point in order.

Part of a building is constructed with a fence installed on the line which connects each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 6 of the same drawing indication, and each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 6 (hereinafter “the toilet, the part of the building, and the fence”). Attached 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 6, 15, 20, 20, 5, 4, and 8, the part inside the ship connected each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 6, and the Defendant occupies the part of 35 square meters inside the ship (hereinafter “the part per unit of this case”).

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to remove the toilets, building parts, and fences of this case from the plaintiff and deliver the marina parts of this case to the plaintiff, unless he asserts and proves that he has legitimate right to possess the marina parts of this case.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The defendant purchased the defendant's building without knowing that part of the defendant's building was invaded by the plaintiff's land, and the plaintiff did not use the plaintiff's land, and the plaintiff's land that the defendant invadedd is not less than 35 square meters and thus there is almost no profit from the removal and delivery of the plaintiff.