When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From November 2014 to May 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) provided 337 games (337 U.S.; (b) the content of which is modified to be run by a separate site (D) different from the content of rating classification; and (c) provided multiple customers with 337 games (37 U.S.; 337 U.S.; 337 U.S.C.; 337 U.S.C. 3377 U.S.); and (d) the content of which is modified to be run by using channels (i.e., e., a separate manager’s page).

2. While running an illegal PC using the “337 Game” as above, the Defendant re-established the said PC 6 unit at the police around May 10, 2015, and provided that, from August 1, 2015 to August 4, 2015, “337 games” different from the contents classified in the same manner as that indicated in the preceding paragraph were available to unspecified customers.

As a result, the Defendant provided customers with game products different from those classified by the above method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. A written statement;

1. A written report on the results of appraisal;

1. Game description;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at each site, and their photographs at the time of crackdown;

1. Relevant Article 45 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, the Selection of Punishment, and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and the Selection of Fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. The order of provisional payment;